Moderation In Advancement

Nicholas Carr’s book The Shallows is, ultimately, Carr sharing a well worded warning due to his fear of what humanity is to become if we are to stay on the path we currently travel as a species. He fears that mankind is to become so dependent upon the technology that is provided to us via the Internet that it shall come to a point where, as he said, our “…’human elements’ are outmoded and dispensable.” This fear, as evidence of Carr’s entire book, is warranted due to the evidence he presents. Yet, Carr does not really present a proposed solution to this fear of his; he makes it clear that he understands that the benefits seemingly outweigh the negatives, and then does not really say what we can do to avoid this science fiction-like demise. I feel that had Carr taken a bit of a broader look at history in perspective to the issue he wrote about, he would see historically there is an answer that is tried and true. Moderation in advancement. Throughout all of modern history man has made strides within the realm of technology, and within each of these eras the most miraculous of these advancements were looked upon as a possible danger; traditionally what one does not understand must be feared. When antibiotics were first introduced it many were skeptical of ingesting some concoction drummed up in a lab that would miraculously eliminate sickness. Should we then take these pills whenever we feel something wrong with us? Additionally many feared the radio when it first gained popularity in the early 20th century, as it was inane to think a person miles away could be heard in your own home. And what else could be possible as a result of such technology, could they unbeknownst to us allow others to hear us too? Will this advancement eliminate the need for the printed word now that we can hear news and stories at any time any place? These technological and societal advancements, just like the Internet today, do provide more questions and unknown fears than straight up answers. Yet how were these fears and questions quelled? Through moderation of these advancements and by not relying completely upon them. We now know that antibiotics and radio, while perhaps worrisome at first, ended up being significantly beneficial. The fears associated with the radio and the medication, while warranted at the time, ultimately were handled by moderate use of both. The radio did not take over society; it did not become the only form of communication. Antibiotics like penicillin were not this inexplicable cure-all that could be taken at anytime for everything. The same can be said for the 21st century with the Internet, it does not have to turn us into robots that no longer have any ‘human elements’. If we as Internet users use the source in moderation and understand it, we will be fine. Not relying on the Internet for all information and for all communication and entertainment while also understanding its benefits to us as a race will result in a safe and secure future. For the rest of human existence miraculous inventions will be created and people will fear what they may become or what they may lead to; this is expected. However, when we take a step back, look at what is before us and figure out the proper way to utilize and handle this new advancement, our society will not collapse, just as it hasn’t for generations past when they came across a technology we now look at as benign and common place.

Technogical should be a little easier to understand than this.

tech-evo
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Evolution-des-wissens.jpg

Author: James K

My Life consists of the 5 F's: Family, Friends, Film, Football, and Food

5 thoughts on “Moderation In Advancement”

  1. I like how you point out that we have had uncertainties about things before, such as medicine, that have actually created an immense amount of benefits. Maybe the internet will be the same thing. Right now I think that a lot of people are still so unsure about technology since it is relatively new. I think as time goes on, more and more generations are going to view technology as no threat at all. If our generation figures out the proper ways to utilize technology, maybe we won’t view it as a threat anymore either.

    Like

  2. I agree that Carr does share his insights about how he feels the internet will continue to impact us and most of his predictions are grim. That being said, I liked how you pointed out that he does not really offer any solutions. I’m not entirely sure that there are any real solutions to our apparent impending doom as a society at this point in time. Moreover, I certainly don’t want to worry every time I use my computer or phone, but I really do feel that a solution, assuming there will be one, will present itself in time. Who knows, another technology might even come along at some point and make us forget about our issues with the internet.

    Like

  3. I really enjoyed the question you posed: Will this advancement eliminate the need for the printed word now that we can hear news and stories at any time any place? Of course we are unsure of the exact power of the Internet but I agree with your point of taking it in moderation. It is important to bring up the past because human advancements are simply part of life and they have not led to our demise in the past. I do feel as though the internet is overwhelmingly present but I don’t think of it as a threat and I feel that with time we will come to realize that it is our choice what to do with its power.

    Like

  4. I like how you used other examples of advancement to compare to our technological progress. (like medicine and radio) you’re right that Carr didn’t really leave us with a solution for the problem he presented. Also “everything in moderation” is a mantra I try to live by, it was nice you incorporated that idea here. This whole fear—>acceptance pattern humans have when it comes to new innovations that you point out seems like something we won’t be able to get away from. Cool picture.

    Like

  5. After an entire book of problems it definitely would have been comforting if Carr gave some guidance, as a solution is obviously not a simple thing to describe. I do really feel the past should be part of that guide, as so many times we can look at how we handled situations previously to figure out how to handle similar problems in the present.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s